Agency owner
Managing Director, B2B growth agency
2 of 5
new retainers sourced from LinkedIn
first 6 months
Illustrative
Free toolScore your LinkedIn profile in 60 seconds. No login, no call.Run the free Profile Auditor →
Professional services
In consulting you are the product, so LinkedIn ghostwriting for consultants has to do something unusual: publish enough of your method to be genuinely useful, and still leave a clear reason to hire you. We write the diagnosis, the framework and the judgement call, and we use your content as a filter against the wrong-sized project.
You approve every post. If we’re not a fit, we’ll say so on the call.
Or start with the free LinkedIn profile audit
From $1,500/month. Compare plans
Last updated: 5 October 2026
Founders and executives in
What buyers say · market research
Nobody buys consulting from a website. They buy a person they have come to trust at a distance, usually over months, and then they hire the firm attached to that person.
The process runs in a particular order. A problem surfaces. The buyer asks two or three peers who they’d use. Those peers name individuals, not firms. The buyer then checks the named people: LinkedIn, whatever they’ve published, a podcast if one exists. A shortlist of two or three forms before anyone makes contact, and research on visible experts in professional services has consistently found search and LinkedIn doing most of that validation work.
Two consequences shape the content. First, your posts are read mostly by people who will never like or comment, because engaging publicly signals that they have the problem. Second, you’re being assessed on judgement rather than information. The buyer is not learning your subject. They are deciding whether you’d be useful in a room with their board.
Then there’s the second buyer nobody designs for: the procurement lead or the chief of staff who builds the shortlist for the sponsor. A post that gives that person something defensible to forward is worth more than ten posts aimed at the sponsor directly.
Eight angles built on the principle of giving away the framework and keeping the judgement.
1. The diagnostic. The five questions you ask in a first meeting, and what each answer tells you. The reader runs it on themselves, finds the gap and discovers they’d rather have you interpret it.
2. The anti-pitch. Who shouldn’t hire you, what to do instead, and which cheaper option is genuinely correct for them. This is the fastest trust-builder in the category and the most effective filter against bad-fit enquiries.
3. The named framework. A model with a name, published in full, used consistently for a year. Named IP is what turns a consultant into someone who gets quoted, invited and referred.
4. The teardown. The standard approach in your field, taken apart, with your alternative and the conditions under which the standard approach is actually right.
5. Aggregated benchmarks. What you see across engagements: the usual before-state, the typical failure mode, how long things really take. Anonymised and aggregated, cleared against your client agreements.
6. Pricing and scoping in public. Why you work on fixed fees or day rates, what a scope change really costs, how you’d buy your own service. Serious buyers read this closely and time-wasters leave.
7. The post for the gatekeeper. Written for the person assembling the shortlist rather than the person signing. Comparison criteria, the questions to ask any firm in your field, including ones you’d find uncomfortable.
8. The thing you taught a client to do themselves. Work you could have billed for, handed over. It’s the single strongest signal that you sell outcomes rather than hours.
Three things make this different from writing for a product company.
Confidentiality without sterility. Most engagements sit under an NDA, and the clients worth naming are the ones least likely to agree. We work from pattern and aggregate, the same way you’d speak at a closed-door roundtable. Where a specific story is the only way to make the point, we get written sign-off or we don’t run it.
Several partners, one narrative. When a firm puts three or four partners on LinkedIn, the usual result is four people saying similar things in slightly different words, which dilutes everyone. We assign distinct territories: one owns the diagnostic, one owns the sector view, one owns delivery and one owns the market commentary. Partners cross-reference each other rather than repeating. That coordination is a corporate personal branding programme rather than several separate retainers.
Positioning as a filter. If your enquiries are the wrong size or the wrong scope, that’s a content problem before it’s a sales problem. Generic expertise content attracts generic work. We deliberately narrow the position, which reduces enquiry volume and raises the average deal. Say this out loud to your partners before you start, because the first month can look like a step backwards.
Regulated advisers, accountants and auditors carry extra constraints: professional body rules on how services may be described, independence requirements that limit commentary on certain clients or sectors, and in some cases restrictions on comparative claims. We ask for your compliance manual at the start and write inside it.
Because the method was never the scarce part.
Publishing your framework does three things at once. It proves the framework exists, which separates you from the consultants who improvise and charge for the improvisation. It attracts buyers who already agree with your approach, shortening the sale. And it quietly disqualifies the people who were going to take your proposal and run it internally; they were never going to buy, and now they cost you nothing.
What stays scarce is judgement under pressure: knowing which of the five diagnostic answers matters in this organisation, what to do when the sponsor changes, which recommendation to drop to get the other three approved. None of that is transferable in a post, and the buyer knows it.
The firms that lose from this are the ones whose entire value was holding a framework other people couldn’t see. If that describes you, the content will reveal it, which is a useful thing to find out.
Managing Director, B2B growth agency
2 of 5
new retainers sourced from LinkedIn
first 6 months
Illustrative
Founder, Strategy consultancy
6
speaking and podcast invitations
first year
Illustrative
Founding partner, strategy consultancy
“The work filters out small projects before they reach my inbox.”
Professional ServicesNewsletter Ghostwriting
Items marked Sample are anonymised, illustrative examples written to typical industry ranges. They are not client results.
Consulting proof is awkward for the same reason your own case studies are awkward: the client has to agree. Until a named one is published, ask on the call to see a voice guide, a partner territory map and a monthly report. The case studies hub holds everything approved for publication.
LinkedIn ghostwriting agency →
Voice capture, voice guide, cadence and approvals in full.
Content-led LinkedIn lead generation →
Turning the framework into a lead magnet and a conversation.
LinkedIn newsletter ghostwriting →
The long-form format buyers subscribe to and forward internally.
Related sectors: LinkedIn ghostwriting for lawyers, which shares the confidentiality constraint, and LinkedIn ghostwriting for SaaS founders if you sell alongside a product. All ten sit on the industries hub, and the blog carries the longer guides.
The three published packages apply, from $1,500 a month. Solo consultants usually start on The Presence at $1,500. Firms running several partners should ask about a programme price rather than stacking retainers.
Programme pricing. Priced per executive, with a programme fee. Quoted after the audit call.
3-month minimum, then month to month with 30 days' notice. Prices exclude VAT (5% for UAE-based clients).
Compare what’s in each package
Only in aggregate, unless a client signs off in writing. The default is pattern-based content: the failure mode you see repeatedly, the typical starting state, what usually goes wrong at month three. It reads as more credible than a case study anyway, because it shows volume of experience rather than one flattering example.
It costs you the buyers who were going to copy it, who were never going to pay. It wins the buyers who want the person who built it. The scarce asset is judgement in a specific situation, and that can’t be published.
Territories, agreed at the start. Each partner owns a distinct pillar and a distinct audience, and they reference each other rather than overlapping. Run as one programme with one narrative, not as four separate accounts. See corporate personal branding.
Only if the positioning is narrow, and narrowing it usually reduces enquiry volume before it raises enquiry quality. We say this before you sign, because month two can feel like a mistake. If your current problem is too many small enquiries, that’s a positioning symptom and it’s the first thing the audit call looks at.
Your published work, your proposals and decks with client details removed, recordings of your own talks, and a session with whoever in the firm answers the hardest technical questions. We build a glossary you correct. Within a month you’re editing argument rather than terminology.
Reach, then engagement from the titles that actually hire you, then profile views and search appearances from target accounts, then inbound: enquiries, referral conversations, speaking invitations and panel requests. We also track the enquiries you decline, because a rising decline rate for bad-fit work is evidence that the positioning is biting.
Still have a question? Email us, or book your free audit call.
Bring the last five enquiries you turned down. They tell us more about your positioning problem than your website does.
hello@thoughtleaders.aeWe reply within one working dayMon–Fri, 9:00–18:00 GST
You approve every post. If we’re not a fit, we’ll say so on the call.